by Susan Davis | 10:00 AM March 22, 2013
If you believe the hype, technology is going to help us end global poverty. Advances have indeed made a huge difference in the lives of the poor, but there's also a healthy amount of skepticism out there. Berkeley researcher Kentaro Toyama has a blog dedicated to calling out naïve or inappropriate uses of information and communication technologies (ICT).
The organization I'm part of, BRAC, is known for going to scale with solutions that are often radically low-tech. We're more likely to scale up birthing kits that cost less than 50 cents apiece than mobile apps that might diagnose disease; more likely to open one-room schools in rented spaces or evenboats, where children sit on the floor and learn to think creatively, than insist that every pupil have Internet access.
For Full Article: http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/03/can_technology_end_poverty.html
Anumakonda Jagadeesh comments
Yes. Technology can end poverty.
Technology advancement should be centered around common man. The technology
should be coupled with social justice.
The Challenge today is to harness science to the chariot wheels of progress and to press science as a deliberate tool to serve the basic needs of the common man and contribute to the economic, social, and cultural transformation of the country.
The Challenge today is to harness science to the chariot wheels of progress and to press science as a deliberate tool to serve the basic needs of the common man and contribute to the economic, social, and cultural transformation of the country.
If the benefits of science and technology are to reach
the vast majority of our people who live in country side, some serious thinking
is called for to develop science to serve the needs of these people. Science
must be relevant and percolate to reach these people and involve the people in
the process of development. This calls for organisation and management of
science and developing science to suit the development of these people.
Innovative Technology
The new awareness – culminating in quest for Innovative
Technology has three components : the realization that man’s inner needs are as
great as, if not greater than, his outer requirements ; the appreciation of the
inadequacy of our institutions for rethinking and the acceptance of the fact
that the world is evolving not towards a plurality of civilizations.
The Innovative Technology arises from the new awareness.
A prior commitment to enlightened cosmologies is a necessary pre-condition for
the development of the Innovative Technology. As such, the Innovative
Technology :
• integrates values with knowledge
• replaces linear thinking of old science by the
multi-dimensional systems approach ;
• is multi-cultural, that is, it carries different hopes
and aspirations for different groups of people ; and
• gives rise to alternative Innovative Technologies.
The Innovative Technology is based on a new concept and
is intended for the well-being of men and his habitat. It encourages direct
innovation with human needs and environmental imperatives in view. It is unique
to people and their culture, it is their technology and will meet only their
needs and their requirements.
Three essential ingredients to evolve such Innovative
Technology are :
• Mass scientific network: This is basically an extension
network covering agriculture and related activities, public health and
industry.
• Local problem-solving capability: Formalized groups
within rural industries and other production units:
(a) to articulate its demand for additional inputs ;
(b) to establish outward linkages into the national
S&T system ; and
© to extend inward linkages into the extension network
serving the locality.
Content and Scope of Innovative Technologies
In this field several terms have sprung up and have been
indiscriminately used like (a) Intermediate technology or low technology, (b)
appropriate technology, and © Innovative Technologies.
(a) Intermediate or Low Technology
Intermediate technology has meant many things to many
people as a type of technology which lies in between the primitive technology
and sophisticated technology. The concept of intermediate technology comes very
near the one propagated by Mahatma Gandhi the Father of our Nation – but this
would hardly satisfy our scientists in these countries, who, by training and
temperament, are keen on undertaking internationally fashion oriented
sophisticated research. Development of intermediate technologies, by and large,
has thus remained a programme to be worked at technician’s level.
(b) Appropriate Technology
Appropriate technology is a priori a normative concept which
implies that its delimitation can take place only after the norms are decided.
These norms change with every shift in time and place. At the advent of
Industrial Revolution, technological innovations aimed at diversifying product
design and cheapening the production cost for meeting the needs of rapidly
expanding consumer market. Appropriateness of technology was considered in
terms of profit, with or without a concern for social goals.
© Innovative Technologies
Innovative Technology is defined as development of
technologies or production systems, which are not only appropriate to a social
situation at a particular point of time, but also is free from the deleterious
effects such as alienation or environmental imbalances. It considers the
possible social and environmental changes, and this has built-in flexibility to
adjust changing needs. Since such technologies would have to be essentially
based on the integrated development of the total region, the concept becomes
more wide in its economic, social and political perspective. At the scientific
level it poses new challenges for the scientists to devise new technologies
that are not available anywhere. It compels the scientists to come out to the
people and try to understand them, their needs, their environment, their
traditional technologies and skills, understand the science behind such skills
based on experience and observation, and then evolve new techniques of
production to suit their resources and native genius and meet their needs.
The quest for Innovative Technology means many things to
many people and they are summarised as below:
To people it may mean
- gainful employment ;
- self-help, and competence to utilize their skills and
other resources;
- inculcation of scientific temper : with the association
of cultural change, they may turn for help to science rather than to quackery;
- acceleration of development with multiplier effects ;
and
- a feeling of adventure and pride in achievement
To the Planners and Policy Makers, it may mean
- a different approach to grass-root planning
- science is used deliberately as a tool for growth and
selective changes;
- better utilisation of resources (including wastes);
- more and better distributed employment opportunities
with less movement of people ;
- an integrated approach with flexibility of adjustment
as per available resources ; and
- maintenance of ecological balances.
Human Resources – Traditional Knowledge and Methods –
Great Assets to Developing Countries
Ideas float around in bewildering numbers, and scores of
designs, ranging from windmills to the spinning wheel, are available ; papers
are circulated stating the wonders of intermediate (not innovative) technology
what could be done, why it should be done, what must be done, and how the rural
countryside can be changed if intermediate technology is implemented. Experts
are called from abroad to tell people this.
In all this talk, there seems to be no place for the
ideas generated by farmers, rural artisans. A stand seems to have been taken
that this transfer of technology for the socio-economic regeneration of the
rural areas is a novelty for country-folk. But rural communities have survived
for generations without any help in ideas and materials from outside. They have
developed a low-cost technology of their own, suited to their own particular
areas. It would be foolish to overlook and take for granted methods used by
farmers and artisans. When a ploughshare develops trouble on the field, when a
bullock cart breaks down on the road to market, when a house collapses in a
storm, the villager uses materials available in the immediate vicinity to solve
his problem. It is the scientist who must see these problems as challenges that
must be met if there is to be development in rural areas. It is clear that the
villagers and scientists will see the problems of the villages quite
differently, and it will not always be true that the projects proposed by the
scientists will be meaningful to the villages. If projects are imposed on the
villagers, they are likely to be skeptical and may well resist rather than
co-operate with the programme. Rural Development Schemes, in the broadest
sense, requires first a good sociological approach, and as much psychology as
scientific knowledge. After all ‘country means people and not soil’.
Problems – People – Solutions
Research, Development and Demonstration projects in
developing countries have generated a variety of devices and systems for
exploitation – for example, solar cookers, wind battery charges etc. In
Innovation theory, this is a classic case of technology push, that is,
technical solutions looking for a social application. Technology push
innovations might of course be adopted if they happen to satisfy a real demand,
or are heavily promoted. Success is much more likely, however if the needs,
priorities and demands are studied before attempting to introduce a new
technology or system. This is the demand pull approach to innovation.
Often identifying the right problem is difficult rather
than finding a possible solution. People are better judges to identify the
problems and since they benefit most by the solutions, they can contribute for
finding the best solutions.
A novel and innovative scheme is suggested to achieve the
above goal.
In developing countries the Government can advertise in
the media seeking problems from the people in different disciplines like
education, health, energy, industry etc. The problems received can be screened,
studied and short-listed by a committee comprising government officials,
experts, representatives from N.G.O’s etc. The short-listed problems can be
re-advertised seeking solutions from people. The solutions received can be
studied in detail and the best solutions given awards. To catch a fish the bait
should be attractive enough. As such there should be sizeable incentive so that
people can devote their talent and energies for finding solutions. As the
saying goes ‘Anything can be done for a Dollar’. In this way the creative
potential of the people can be tapped to the full and a thought process will be
set in motion in the country. In India a general knowledge programme conducted
by a Super Star on TV is a roaring success and children, youth and old-all
alike have become addicted to get equipped with general knowledge so that they
can try their luck for winning fabulous cash prizes.
The Author has developed Novel solutions and sustainable
technologies for the benefits of bottoms billions like Everybody’s Solar Water
Heater, Simple Solar Drier, Safe Drinking Water from Solar Disinfection,Energy
Conservation in Irrigation pumpsets,Hand operated Battery charger, Multiple
Uses of Gas Stove,Pedal operated Washing machine etc.,
Innovation, Invention and creativity are the pillars of
progress of any Society / Nation. The greater the participation of people in
the developmental activities, the quicker will be the progress. A new approach
“Innovative Technology (IT)” deliberately involving people from all walks of
life is the need of the hour in identifying the felt needs in the developing
countries and finding solutions. Such a technology will contribute to
Integrated Development (ID).
It is not the KNOW HOW but SHOW HOW will help the
technology promotion and propagation quickly in developing countries.While
Science is Universal,Technology is culture specific.
Modernise the Traditional – Traditionalise the Modern. (Commented on March 27, 2013)
No comments:
Post a Comment